The 14-day testing cycle
We do not review any operator that we have not personally tested with real money for a minimum of fourteen days. The full cycle:
Days 1–2: Onboarding
- Account creation from a NY IP address. Time the signup flow.
- KYC verification with a real government-issued ID. Time the verification end-to-end.
- First deposit at a low test amount ($10–$50 depending on operator minimum).
- Document any friction (verification errors, payment method limits, geolocation issues).
Days 3–7: Gameplay testing
- Daily sessions of at least 30 minutes across slot, table, and live-dealer game categories (where available).
- Track bet sizes, session length, win/loss, and any UX friction in a shared testing log.
- Test on both desktop (Safari and Chrome) and mobile (iOS Safari, Android Chrome).
- Note responsiveness, layout issues, sound quality, animation smoothness.
Days 8–10: Customer service test
- One live-chat ticket on a routine question (e.g., "how does the welcome bonus wagering requirement work?"). Time the response and grade the accuracy.
- One email ticket on a more complex question (e.g., "I'd like to know how parimutuel resolution affects RTP on slot X"). Time the response.
- One social-media public mention (where the operator has an active account). Note whether it gets a response and how quickly.
Days 11–13: Redemption test
- Request a withdrawal at or near the operator's median threshold.
- Document every status change and timestamp from request to cleared funds.
- Note any additional verification requests that get triggered.
Day 14: Scoring & write-up
- Score the operator across our six weighted categories.
- Draft the review with a named writer.
- Fact-check pass by a second editor.
- Compliance review (for any legal/tax claims) by Lena Ortiz.
- Publish — or hold for additional testing if there are unresolved issues.
Scoring model
We score every operator on six categories with fixed weights:
| Category | Weight | What we look at |
|---|---|---|
| Game library & software quality | 25% | Total title count, provider diversity, RTP transparency, technical reliability |
| Redemption speed & customer service | 20% | End-to-end withdrawal timing; CS response time and accuracy |
| Bonus value (effective, not headline) | 20% | Realistic expected value of the welcome bonus after wagering requirements and game-eligibility constraints |
| Mobile UX | 15% | Mobile web speed, cashier flow, navigation usability, layout robustness |
| Trust & licensing signals | 10% | Visible licensing, ownership transparency, third-party audits, RG tools availability |
| Player-protection tools | 10% | Deposit limits, time-outs, self-exclusion, reality checks — all five must be present for full marks |
A site that fails the trust category is not recommended, no matter how it scores on other categories. We've held two operators out of our top-five rankings in 2026 for trust failures we won't detail publicly (one for misrepresenting RTP in customer-service responses; one for accepting NY traffic in violation of S5935A's geofencing requirements).
Fact-checking & corrections
Every commercial page goes through two fact-checking passes:
- Writer self-check. Source every numeric claim (welcome offer amounts, withdrawal speeds, game library counts) to an operator's published terms or our own testing log. Source every legal claim to a NY State statute, regulator filing, or named legal expert.
- Editor cross-check. A different team member re-verifies every numeric and legal claim independently.
If we find an error after publication:
- Correct it the same day the error is verified.
- Add a dated correction note at the top of the affected section.
- Update the page's
dateModifiedin schema. - If the error materially changed a recommendation, send a correction note via our alerts list.
To submit a correction: [email protected].
Conflict of interest policy
- Writers may not hold equity in any reviewed operator.
- Writers must disclose any prior employment relationship with a reviewed operator. (One current example: Lena Ortiz previously worked as in-house counsel for a NJ-regulated operator. She does not review that operator. Devon Brooks fact-checks any page involving them.)
- Writers must disclose any free play credit received from an operator (we generally decline these; on the rare occasion we accept, we document the dollar value in the review).
- The site's affiliate-commission status is disclosed on every page (see affiliate disclosure).
How we handle legislative coverage
For pages discussing NY gambling law (S5935A, S2614, future bills):
- Lena Ortiz fact-checks every legal claim before publication.
- Sources are linked directly to bill text on nysenate.gov, NYSGC filings, or named legal experts.
- Legislative status pages are reviewed at least weekly; more often when bills are in committee.
- When a legal status changes (a bill passes or dies, a regulation issues), we update the affected pages within 48 hours.
What we don't do
- We don't publish "guest posts" from operator PR teams.
- We don't use generative AI to produce review content. (We use AI for grammar, fact-look-up, and code — never for synthesizing experiential claims.)
- We don't accept editorial influence in exchange for commission rates.
- We don't recommend operators that violate U.S. gambling law as it applies to NY residents.
How to contact the editorial team
Editorial inquiries: [email protected]
Corrections: [email protected]
Compliance / legal claims: [email protected]